hard case doubt

Because of a "true or false" housing sales contracts, between father and son raised "seizes the real war". Father saw his son Xiao Zhu couple delays limit, requests to terminate the contract for the sale of housing is housing department; Xiao Zhu couples said parents grant. Who is lying?

by judge carefully, the case gradually clear. Recently, Pudong New Area court verdict, because between the two couple signed a contract for the sale and transfer of property rights is not objective, in payment of the price as the premise, Cheap football jerseys the true meaning of between the two cheap nhl jerseys parties said should be regarded as the housing grant, it rejected old Zhu couples for the sales contracts and the restoration of property rights to the name appeal.

parents statement, had not the gift

The old couple

Zhu said in court, in order to make cheap nba jerseys their own retirement, house-for-pension scheme, the decision will be a set of housing 240000 yuan cheap soccer jerseys to the price sold to his son Xiao zhu. After the agreement is signed real, Xiao Zhu put forward economic difficulties, do not pay. The old couple is filial son read and Zhu, does not care about. In 2007 May, father and son, both for the transfer of housing transfer procedures together. The results, more than 4 years later, "not the slightest movement of money" thing. Lao Zhu to Xiaozhu bombarded several times, always be a variety of excuses. Are the heart cool old Zhu issued Dunning letters, payment within 5 days after the letter asked Xiao zhu. At the expiration of that period, has not yet received 1629, Lao Zhu couple then Xiaozhu couple of court.

and Xiaozhu couples are saying different. They said that the two sides signed contracts of sale is "false", a gift cheap mlb jerseys is "really". Because of the gift than transaction taxes are high, in order to save costs, just pretend signed contracts of sale.

siblings witness, hard case doubt

files? Lao Zhu couple called son and daughter to testify in court. "A few years ago my father said that the house sold to brother, I'll pay with his brother said the house is parents pension, it should be, but my brother didn't ignore me. The year before the Spring Festival, I was present with his sister, his father made clear that the house was sold to his brother, told him to pay 1629, but my brother is not give." The eldest son say. A daughter agrees. Xiaozhu wife thinks, Xiaozhu parents is due to other members of the family pressure to engage in a lawsuit, but the expression of the true meaning of non elderly. In the trial, Xiaozhu couples house guarantee commitment, let parents live in his home, and did not make any possible damage to the transfer, rental and other disciplinary actions they live right.

Judge

eye, discern the merits of

in the relevant evidence, judge and finally found the clues of the case: the original housing sales contracts in the agreed transfer price and the transfer time, the rest of the main provisions include payment, the others time are blank, this and other normal housing sales contracts are obviously different. Just think, in the housing transfer to the defendant for more than 4 years, the plaintiff failed to provide evidence that it had been the limit for payment. Until the lawsuit is a few days ago, the plaintiff to the defendant Dunning letter. Then, brother and sister both testimony credible? The judges found from the court statement two witnesses, brother and sister both had not been involved in >